No state family or medical leave statute beyond federal FMLA
Ohio has not enacted a state family or medical leave statute that supplements the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. Private-sector employers in Ohio operate under the federal FMLA exclusively for general family and medical leave. Employees seeking unpaid, job-protected leave for a serious health condition, to care for a covered family member, or for birth or adoption must meet federal FMLA eligibility (covered employer, 12 months of service, 1,250 hours in the preceding 12 months) and are limited to the federal 12-week entitlement. Ohio does provide a separate military family leave right under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5906, discussed in a later section.
Source: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (FMLA) | Ohio Rev. Code Ch. 5906 (military family leave)
Military family leave — 10 days for deployment or injury of uniformed service member
Ohio requires employers with 50 or more employees to provide up to 10 days or 80 hours (whichever is less) of unpaid leave per calendar year when an employee's parent, spouse, child, or person under the employee's legal custody who is a member of the uniformed services is either (1) called to active duty for more than 30 days or (2) injured, wounded, or hospitalized while serving on active duty. To qualify, the employee must have worked at least 12 consecutive months and 1,250 hours in the preceding 12 months. The employee must have exhausted all available leave except sick leave or disability leave, and must provide at least 14 days' notice for deployment leave or 2 days' notice for injury leave (waived for critical or life-threatening injuries). Leave dates must occur no more than two weeks before or one week after the service member's deployment. Upon return, the employer must restore the employee to the same position or one with equivalent seniority, benefits, and pay.
Jury duty leave — discharge protection and PTO-use prohibition for permanent employees
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.19 provides two distinct protections for employees summoned for state-court jury duty: a prohibition on adverse employment action and a ban on requiring employees to exhaust paid leave. Both apply to all private and public employers in Ohio; neither statute imposes an employer-size threshold.
Discharge and disciplinary-action prohibition (§ 2313.19(A))
An employer may not discharge, threaten to discharge, or take any disciplinary action that could lead to the discharge of a permanent employee who is summoned to serve as a juror under Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 2313, provided the employee (1) gives reasonable notice to the employer of the summons prior to the commencement of jury service and (2) is absent from employment because of actual jury service. The statute does not define "permanent employee" for private-sector purposes; courts and agency interpretations have not settled whether it excludes probationary, seasonal, or temporary employees. Ohio Admin. Code 123:1-47-01(56) defines "permanent employee" for state civil service as a person in a position requiring a regular schedule of at least 26 consecutive bi-weekly pay periods that is not limited to a specific season or duration, but that definition is not codified for private employers. An employer seeking to apply the statute only to non-probationary or indefinite-duration employees faces interpretive risk; the safer practice is to extend the discharge protection to all employees summoned for jury duty.
The reasonable-notice condition is mandatory but not further specified in the statute. There is no binding authority from Butler or Franklin counties, nor any published Ohio appellate decision, establishing a fixed notice interval or a 14-day benchmark for notice after receiving a summons. Practitioners should be aware that the statute does not impose a minimum notice period, only a reasonable one, and there is no primary-authority decision clarifying the reasonableness standard.
Prohibition on requiring paid-leave use (§ 2313.19(B))
Separately, § 2313.19(B) bars an employer from requiring or requesting an employee to use annual, vacation, or sick leave for time spent responding to a summons, participating in the jury selection process, or actually serving on a jury. Unlike subsection (A), subsection (B) applies to "an employee" without the "permanent" qualifier, indicating that the PTO-use prohibition reaches all employees regardless of status. The statute explicitly states that this prohibition does not require an employer to provide annual, vacation, or sick leave to employees who are not otherwise entitled to those benefits under the employer's policies. In practice, this means (1) an employer that offers PTO may not compel an employee on jury duty to deplete it, but (2) an employer with no PTO policy has no obligation to create one or to pay employees for jury-service hours. Ohio law does not require private employers to compensate employees for jury duty time; only public-sector employers are subject to separate compensation rules under Ohio Admin. Code provisions governing state, county, and municipal civil service.
Scope of protected jury service
The statute covers three phases: responding to a summons (which includes time traveling to court and checking in), participating in the jury selection process (voir dire), and actually serving on a jury (trial or deliberation). An employee dismissed mid-day during voir dire remains protected for the full day of service; the employer may not require the employee to return to work immediately upon release if doing so would impose an unreasonable burden, though the statute does not establish a bright-line rule on same-day return.
Enforcement and penalties
An employer that violates § 2313.19 (either subsection (A) or (B)) may be punished as for contempt of court under Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 2705. Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.99(A) cross-references this penalty. Contempt sanctions under § 2705 can include fines and imprisonment at the court's discretion. An employee whose employer terminates or disciplines them in violation of § 2313.19(A), or who is compelled to use PTO in violation of § 2313.19(B), should notify the jury commissioner or clerk of the court that issued the summons; the court may initiate contempt proceedings sua sponte or on the employee's complaint. The statute does not create a private cause of action for damages, but an aggrieved employee may also pursue a wrongful-discharge claim under Ohio common law if the termination violates public policy (jury service is a recognized public-policy anchor in Ohio case law).
Federal overlay
The federal Jury System Improvements Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1875, separately prohibits discharge or intimidation of any permanent employee on account of federal jury service and provides for reinstatement, back pay, and attorney's fees. An employer must comply with both the federal statute (for federal jury duty) and Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.19 (for state jury duty). The Ohio statute's "permanent employee" limitation in subsection (A) mirrors the federal statute's language, though neither defines the term, creating parallel ambiguity.
Ohio voting leave — reasonable amount of time to vote on election day
Ohio law requires all employers—public and private—to provide employees with a "reasonable amount of time" off work to vote on the day of a general, primary, or special election. Under Ohio Rev. Code § 3599.06, employers are prohibited from:
- Discharging or threatening to discharge an employee for taking time to vote
- Inflicting or threatening to inflict any injury, harm, or loss
- Imposing on an employee any requirement to bring a companion to the polls
- Refusing service as an election official due to exercising voting rights
Amount and pay status of leave: The statute mandates that leave must be for a "reasonable amount of time"—but does not specify a fixed number of hours, nor does it clarify whether the leave must be paid. There is no explicit obligation under § 3599.06 for an employer to compensate employees for time spent voting. Official agency guidance is likewise silent. As of 2026-06-15, no published Ohio Attorney General opinion or Department of Commerce guidance on a .gov host clarifies whether paid leave is required for any class of employee. Employers may elect their own paid/unpaid policy, but should apply it uniformly and be wary of indirect discouragement.
Penalties for employer violations under § 3599.06 include fines ranging from $50 to $500 per occurrence. Source: Ohio Rev. Code § 3599.06
Military family leave — enforcement, remedies, and FMLA coordination
Remedies and enforcement under Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 5906
Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5906, which grants eligible employees up to 10 days (or 80 hours) of military family leave for deployment or injury of a family member in the uniformed services, outlines both employee protections and enforcement mechanisms. If an employer denies or interferes with this leave, the statute authorizes two primary remedies:
- Retaliation and interference prohibition: An employer may not interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of military family leave rights, nor may they discharge, fine, suspend, expel, or discriminate against any employee for exercising these rights (Ohio Rev. Code § 5906.04(A)).
- Private civil action: An affected employee may file a civil action for damages in a court of common pleas located in the county where the employer is based or where the violation occurred. Remedies available include actual damages, equitable relief (such as reinstatement), and attorney’s fees if the employee prevails (Ohio Rev. Code § 5906.04(B)-(C)). The statute does not provide for punitive damages. An employee must bring suit within one year of the alleged violation.
Coordination with Federal FMLA
Where an employee is entitled to both federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave and Ohio military family leave for the same qualifying event (such as deployment or injury of a covered family member), the Ohio statute expressly provides that leave may run concurrently. Ohio Rev. Code § 5906.10(A) states that if the employee qualifies for both, any leave provided under Chapter 5906 shall be used concurrently with, and not in addition to, any leave under the federal FMLA for the same event. The Ohio law does not extend the total leave entitlement beyond the federal FMLA’s 12-week limit when both would otherwise apply.
Crime-victim leave — time off to attend or prepare for criminal proceedings
Ohio law grants certain employees the right to take job-protected leave to attend or prepare for criminal or juvenile court proceedings when they are crime victims or relatives of victims. The substantive leave entitlement comes from Ohio Rev. Code § 2930.18, with nonretaliation reinforced by § 109.42.
Who is covered Ohio Rev. Code § 2930.18 entitles the following individuals to leave: the crime victim (as defined in § 2930.01), and the victim’s spouse, child, stepchild, sibling, parent, stepparent, or grandparent, as well as a designated victim’s representative. This list is exhaustive—the statute does not extend leave broadly to “other” family members. A victim’s representative must be officially designated by the court or prosecutor (§ 2930.01(15)).
When leave is allowed Covered individuals may take leave from work:
- to participate in preparation for a criminal or delinquency proceeding at the prosecutor’s request, OR
- to attend a criminal or juvenile proceeding, when attendance is either requested by the prosecutor or required under subpoena, and is reasonably necessary to protect the victim’s interests (§ 2930.18(A)(1)–(2)).
Notice and documentation The employee must give the employer reasonable advance notice—except in emergencies—along with documentation such as the prosecutor’s request or a subpoena showing eligibility for leave (§ 2930.18(B)). The leave right is conditioned on presenting this documentation.
Retaliation protection Employers are prohibited from punishing, discharging, disciplining, or threatening employees for taking this leave (see § 109.42(C)). However, these statutes do not require employers to pay for such leave—only to treat it as protected, unpaid time if needed for a covered proceeding.
Limits and enforcement The statutes do not create a private right to sue for damages, nor do they require paid leave. Further remedies or agency complaint steps are not expressly provided in the statutes. The right is limited to specific victims/relatives and applies only in connection with the types of proceedings and requests described above.